Texas - Water Riparian Rights (years 1836-1986) Essay

Texas - Water Riparian Rights (years 1836-1986) - Essay Example The divided institutional structure of riparian water rights established snags to accomplishing a proficient and far reaching water-asset the board framework, hence the improvement of a surface water license framework. A riparian zone alludes to a territory that goes about as an interface among land, and a stream or waterway; thus, riparian water rights alludes to the arrangement of allotting water based on riparian land proprietorship. The Riparian tenet was present in Texas more than 200 years prior by Hispanic pilgrims in San Antonio, Texas; the Hispanic practices and legitimate standards turned into the blue print from which land title was conceded. During this time, and through the nineteenth Century, riparian land was conceded and the advantages incorporated the privilege of riparian land proprietors to take water from the streams and waterways for motivations behind water system. This can be best shown on account of Motl v Boyd (1926); the case was about the privileges of Hispanics to take water from streams for water system (Rio Grande). For this situation, the Supreme Court of Texas concluded that the proprietor of riparian land reserved the option to utilize riparian waters for family uni t and local purposes, however for water system purposes also (Hutchins 517). Riparian rights were influenced by two or three fake and normal difficulties; first there was the subject of what established a stream bed, a segment of the riparian zone that would be claimed by the state. Furthermore, there was the subject of characterizing the waterways banks since the limit was ever changing due to synthetic or common reasons. Impacts, for example, disintegration, accumulation, separation, subsidence and abandonment brought about the moving of limits, lessening or expanding the state claimed waterway bed and the private possessed riparian land (Powell 7). In 1840, the province of Texas annulled the Spanish riparian precept and grasped the English riparian precedent-based law with a couple of exemptions from the tenet; this was later

How can the role of leadership be best understood in organizational cha

The job of authority can best be comprehended in hierarchical change as a multi-dimensional wonder. Contingent upon the conceptualisation of authoritative change you embrace, the leader’s job could be seen to be an assortment of things, from that of an initiator/visionary, the influencer of culture, a trigger for adherent hierarchical distinguishing proof, somebody who rethinks opposition, or a sense producer who presents new talks. The most helpful methodology can be to consider an issue from various diverse hypothetical perspectives before deciding the best intercession. Authority has been considered in a large number of various ways fluctuating from Great man hypothesis (Borgatta, Bales and Couch, 1954; Cawthon, 1996), attribute speculations (), and style hypotheses (). Later conceptualisations of initiative incorporate possibility hypothesis (), and transformational authority (). Every one of these hypothetical models has a commitment to make in framing a far reaching comprehension of the connection among authority and hierarchical change and we will investigate how receiving a definition for initiative or authoritative change gathers the job of the other. Anyway we characterize authority, the ideas of hierarchical change and administration can be contended to be inseparably connected. On the off chance that a pioneer couldn't impact any change inside an association then it is difficult to envision a manner by which such a pioneer could be compelling in their job. Along these lines hierarchical change is at the very heart of a leader’s job. This paper will contend that a pluralist way to deal with comprehension leadership’s job in hierarchical change has the best utility in educating practice. In doing as such, it will introduce various ideas ... ...ind of general sense as in doing as such, one ‘mistakes the guide for the terrain’. The job of administration in hierarchical change is a multi-dimensional marvel which, it has been contended in this paper, can be most conveniently comprehended by utilizing a pluralist point of view. In other words, ‘a pluralist approach of looking at different conceivable models of the truth is basic for creating objective logical knowledge’ (Campbell, 1988: 389, in Van de Ven and Poole, 2005). While there are a plenty of focal point through which to comprehend both initiative and change it is progressively helpful to consider a scope of viewpoints and at exactly that point survey the utility of every point of view and it’s suitability for educating a true mediation. In the expressions of Pettigrew (2001) â€Å"In the nonattendance of unambiguous fundamental truth †¦ the main reasonable path forward can be cognizant pluralism.

When Authors Read Their Own Audiobooks (Nonfiction Edition)

When Authors Read Their Own Audiobooks (Nonfiction Edition) Several months ago I wrote about finally trying out audiobooks. I had a pretty narrow viewpoint and had very specific qualifications for the books I would be willing to listen to. I have since expanded those specifications to a point, but I still prefer books narrated by one person. There’s a genre in which this is pretty prominent, and there are some great books to choose from: memoir. If a new memoir isn’t read by the author, it’s actually kind of disconcerting. It’s understandable that they might not to want to spend the equivalent of a workweek talking into a microphonebut still. The switch from Salman Rushdie’s voice to a different reader after the prologue of Joseph Anton was off-putting; knowing Bad Feminist wasn’t being read by Roxane Gay made a little wall for me, taking away from the intimacy such a narrative usually brings to heart. BUT. There are some great memoirs and personal essay collections that have been read by the authors themselves. For one, when they’re written by funny people, they’re the best people to bring forth their humor. While several years old, Bossypants will probably withstand the test of time. Same goes for Yes, Please, Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me? and Bedwetter (which I haven’t actually listened to but I imagine is pretty goodfunny, even, if you’re a fan of Sarah Silverman’s humor. Which I’m not). Neil Patrick Harris’s autobiography couldn’t be half as funny read by someone else, and if Billy Crystal isn’t telling his stories, why would we listen? Two words: John. Waters. It’s not just the funny people who put their best feet forward. Sidney Poitier will hold you captive for hours at a time while taking you with him on his journey. Wes Moore, first on his journey through The Other Wes Moore and later during his trek through early adulthood, tells the story in a heartfelt way that feels far more real that it might from a professional. And Christopher Plummer, letch that he is, will tell you about nearly 80 years of adventure and escapades like you were hanging out over a beer. Sometimes, though, the author has a marvelously soothing voice. Not particularly good for a slow day at work or sitting in traffic. No more Bill Bryson for me. There are other highlights in nonfiction that have been read by the author. Reza Aslan was determined to read the audiobook for Zealot and Jill Lepore felt the same need for The Secret History of Wonder Woman. Neither is a professional, but the passion for their work comes through in every word spoken. Nothing bores me more than a listless audiobook. This doesn’t mean, of course, that every author who reads their own book does it perfectly. But there’s something about reading your own wordsfor any of usthat just feels right. ____________________ Book Riot Live is coming! Join us for a two-day event full of books, authors, and an all around good time.

Essay on The Existence of God - 1579 Words

In answering questions regarding God, the argument from evil is a very peculiar argument. Most of the arguments we deal with will try to prove the existence of god. This argument on the other hand attempts to do the opposite and I really stress on the word attempt. Another reason why I say it is peculiar is because it is not just one argument, but rather a series of three arguments. In my opinion, this argument is quite weak and does not prove what it was intended to prove but rather it does the opposite. I would say that it somewhat opens doors to prove the existence of God. Throughout this essay, my goal is not to prove to you that God exists or doesnt exist, but my goal here today is to provide you with some criticism towards this†¦show more content†¦So if a being posses these three basic qualities at its maximum or to infinity, then that being must definitely be God. One may wonder what evil is and as I mentioned before, evil is broken into two groups. One may also wonder weather evil even exists, but I will go over that later on. So with that aside, evil are the wrong that are brought into existence by human actions, and this is suffering that human beings inflict on each other. The other evil is the evil that exist because of natural events that are not under human control. This may be in the form of a natural disaster such as a plague or an earthquake. Now by knowing what God and evil is, I will assure you that you will get a better understanding of what the argument really means. More or less, the argument states that if there was a God, He must be all PKG (powerful, knowing, and good) and by being all PKG, then there would be no evil in the world. It then goes on saying that yes! evil does exist. If you were to look at the world anywhere, you would find at least one of the evils. So since evil exists, according to the argument, then there is no God. Here we find the use of a valid argument. It has the following skeleton (1) If T, then P (2) Not P (3) Not T So any argument which uses this same format is completely valid. In the argument it claims that since evil exists, then God does notShow MoreRelatedThe Existence Of God : God1305 Words   |  6 PagesThe existence of God has been in question for as long as mankind has existed and thought logically. Many questions have plagued the human mind in regards to God, and there have been many arguments drawn with the hopes of proving the existence of a supreme being whom we know as God. The â€Å"God† question has been presented to every individual at some point in their lives. It is a topic that will bring forth never-ending questions and an equal amount of attempted answers. Many philosophers have formulatedRead MoreThe Existence Of God1304 Words   |  6 PagesIn this paper I’m going to argue that there exists only one God who is the most beneficent and the most merciful and that Blackburn’s claim for the existence of evil doesn t prove that there does not exist a God who is all knowing, all good and all powerful. Exposition:(349 words) In chapter five, Blackburn expresses his take on the existence of God. He believes that people with religious beliefs have to be evaluated â€Å"in terms of truth and falsity†. He thinks that that it is just the set of ritualsRead MoreThe Existence Of God s Existence1339 Words   |  6 Pagesidea of God. The existence of God is one of the most sought out topic that is frequently inquired. Is there really a God or is God merely a concept humans created to explain the unexplainable? And if God does exist, what makes him different from the rest of us? A well-known philosopher, St. Thomas Aquinas, introduced five proofs including the Cosmological Arguments of God’s existence, as well as explained some divine qualities that are associated with God. The nature of God’s existence is oftenRead MoreThe Existence of God1317 Words   |  6 PagesThe Existence of God For centuries, the idea of God has been a part of mans history. Past and present, there has always been a different integration consisting of the believers and the non-believers of God. The group of those who have faith in God tend to be related to one religion or another. On the other hand, the skeptics find the existence of God somewhat puzzling and try to seek the answers through scientific methods. Even as of today with all the modern technologies and the developmentRead MoreThe Existence Of God2601 Words   |  11 Pagesstatements established about the unseen and natural forces since the beginning of time. It gave rise to questions such as: Do aliens exist? Is there a world of the unseen? Life after Death and the most popular question since the beginning of times, Does God exists? And the answer is ‘yes’. Here is how I will justify my stance. Imagine yourself walking in the middle of a desert, which shows no signs of life regardless of which ever direction your eyes turn to. When, suddenly, you see something reflectingRead MoreGod s Existence Of God936 Words   |  4 PagesNot Be Afraid to Explore More Than One Religion God’s existence sometimes does not exist to certain people. When it comes to the teaching and knowledge about God many people are not aware because they have never been taught about how God appeared on the earth. I choose this topic because I was one of those people who has never really been raised around certain religion nor about the teaching how God came to be. However, I have been taught that God does exist and that his son Jesus are the reason forRead MoreThe Argument On The Existence Of God1629 Words   |  7 PagesThe idea of God has been a part of man’s history for centuries. Since time began there has been various combination of believers, and non-believers. Individuals who believes in God, belong to many different religion. Whereas, skeptics find the existence of God somewhat baffling, and have continually sought answers to His existence through scientific methods. As the world progresses in scientific, and technological advancement, the human race still face s the question of God’s existence. Many philosophersRead MoreAtheism And The Existence Of God Essay1294 Words   |  6 Pagesevident fact that God exists. Whereas some atheists would claim that the theists bear the burden of proof since they are making supernatural claims. In the following essay I will be discussing both opinions on this matter, and perhaps show how the burden of proof lies on both of them and neither of them. I will begin this discussion by defining the recurring terms during the discussion on the existence of God. Traditionally the three attitudes one could hold towards the existence of God are theism, atheismRead MoreEvil And The Existence Of God1147 Words   |  5 PagesThis essay is based on how the problem of evil attacks head on into the existence of god who is all good, all powerful and all knowing. The problem of evil is a wide area that can t be outrun easily. The concept of evil has been problematic to many philosophers. When speaking about evil, we all have the idea that is the absence of good. For some religious people, Evil has been described as a supernatural force, although for others is been described as part of the human nature. Blackburn mainly raiseRead MoreEssay on The Existence Of God908 Words   |  4 PagesPopular Arguments For The Existence Of God The Ontological Argument One of the most important attempts to demonstrate the existence of God is the ontological argument of Saint Anselm, an 11th-century theologian. Anselm’s argument maintains that God, defined as the greatest being that can be conceived, must exist, since a being that does not exist would by virtue of that fact lack an attribute that contributes to its greatness. Critics have questioned, however, whether existence actually contributes

Foreign Policy 1776-1807 Dbq Free Essays

During the Washington, Adams, and the Jefferson administrations, the United States was thrust into the decision of joining either Britain or France, the two most powerful European nations. In determining the effects of foreign policy on the developing nation, one must establish the overall direction of the United States took. As a budding nation, George Washington proposed the idea of neutrality in order for the country to have no involvement in European affairs. We will write a custom essay sample on Foreign Policy 1776-1807 Dbq or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, Federalists and Democratic Republicans were outraged by this decision since the Federalists supported the British while the Democratic Republicans supported the French. Neutrality also allowed the United States to temporarily smooth its relations with Europe because of commercial interest. Therefore, neutrality, instead of siding with either Britain or France or through their commercial interests, was the obvious direction taken by foreign policy. After witnessing and being involved in uncontrollable European affairs, the growing nation of the United States concluded that an international policy of neutrality would be the best option in the area of foreign affairs. During his presidency, Washington decided that it was best for America to stay neutral. As stated in his Proclamation of Neutrality that any American providing assistance to any country at war would be punished with legal proceedings (D). He was aware of the possible dangers that would occur when allying with a certain country. The country was too new to enter any wars or deal with wars of foreign countries. â€Å"Europe has a set of primary interests†¦Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns† (J). Even in his farewell address, Washington advised the fledgling nation to not get involved in European affairs or make permanent alliances, to avoid sectionalism, and to not form political parties. After Washington resigned from office, John Adams tried to maintain the position of neutrality as the second president of the United States. He did as much as he could in avoiding war with France. Even before his presidency, in response to a proposed alliance with France, he argued that â€Å"†¦we ought not to enter into any Alliance with her [France], which should entangle Us in any future wars in Europe, that We ought to lay it down as a first principle and a Maxim never to be forgotten, to maintain an entire Neutrality in all future European Wars† (A). However, after the XYZ Affair, in which French agents demanded a large bribe for the restoration of diplomatic relations with the United States, a Quasi War erupted between France and America. The Convention of 1800, also known as the Treaty of Mortefontaine, was a treaty between the United States and France to settle the hostilities that erupted during that war (I). When Thomas Jefferson became president, it was a peaceful transition from Federalist to Democratic Republican. Despite the differences between these political parties, Jefferson also tried to maintain Washington’s idea of neutrality. In his Inaugural Address in 1801, he states â€Å"We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists† and that there would be â€Å"Equal and exact justice to all men, friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (K). Even as a last resort to the Louisiana Purchase, he told Monroe to make an alliance with Great Britain if the Louisiana Purchase did not work out. In all three of their presidencies, Washington, Adams, and Jefferson decided that it was best for the new nation to enter a state of neutrality. Despite its neutrality and unwillingness to enter war with the European nations, the United States were being forced to side with either Great Britain or France, Europe’s most powerful nations. During Washington’s presidency, the revolutionary government of France sent diplomat Edmond-Charles Genet, also known as Citizen Genet, to America to propagandize the case for France in the French war against Great Britain, which created the network of Democratic Republicans. Washington demanded the French government recall Genet, and denounced the societies. The United States were in a conflict with Britain, as the British were seizing American ships and impressing sailors. Hamilton and Washington designed the Jay’s Treaty to normalize trade relations with Britain, remove them from western forts, and resolve financial debts left over from the Revolution (F). John Jay negotiated and signed the treaty in 1794. However, many disputes rose from this decision. James Madison criticized that the treaty stated to open West India ports to the United States, yet Britain refused to follow these regulations (G). During Adam’s presidency, the XYZ Affair, which was supposed to have been the negotiation between America and France on the seizure of American ships, threw the United States into a Quasi War with the French. In the aftermath of the undeclared naval war with France, the Alien and Sedition Acts were passed, which allowed the president to deport hostile aliens, increased residency requirements for citizenship, and banned criticism of government policies or officials. After the United States’ conflict with France, Jefferson, a Democratic Republican, considered the possibility of an alliance with Britain. While Britain and France were both seizing American ships, Britain had the strongest navy and was thus able to force the American sailors into its navy (M). Jefferson believed that this conflict would cease if the United States agreed to establish an alliance with Britain. Torn between the conflict of siding with either France or Britain, the United States agreed to remain neutral. Although neutrality in the new nation was favored, there was a possibility of joining either Britain or France depending on which one was more financially beneficial. After Jay’s Treaty, which was signed with Great Britain during Washington’s presidency, Spain did not want the United States to side with the British and wanted to smooth its relations with the fledgling country. Pinckney’s Treaty, signed on October 27, 1795, established the intentions of friendship between the United States and Spain. The treaty also granted the States use of the Mississippi and right of deposit at New Orleans (H). In the Treaty of Paris in 1783, â€Å"It is agreed that the people of the United States shall continue to enjoy unmolested the right to take fish of every kind on the Grand Bank†¦Ã¢â‚¬  and that â€Å"The navigation of the river Mississippi, from its source to the ocean, shall forever remain free and open to the subjects of Great Britain and the citizens of the United States† (E). Thomas Paine stated that commerce would secure the friendship with Europe because Europe wants America to have a free port (B). Jefferson, fearing the power of the neighboring French in the Louisiana Territory, sent Monroe to Paris to negotiate the purchase in 1802. Their interest was only in the port and its environs. They did not anticipate the much larger transfer of territory that would follow. The purchase greatly benefited the United States because it granted them access to the entire Mississippi River. Also, as a result of impressments of American sailors, Jefferson established the Embargo Act of 1807, also known as the Nonintercourse Acts, restricting American ships from engaging in foreign trade between the years 1807 to 1812. Jefferson believed that without trade with the United States, Britain and France would fall into an economic crisis. However, the Europeans nations did not bother with America and traded with other countries, causing the new nation’s economy to fall. This outraged the general public, and when Jefferson left office, these acts were repealed. Commercial interest helped the United States to choose between siding with either of the European nations or remaining neutral. Throughout the Washington, Adams, and Jefferson administrations, Britain and France tried to force the United States into allying with either of the two nations. Although it was tough to maintain, neutrality was established in the country by Washington. The decision brought various problems for the budding nation, but it still stayed strong. How to cite Foreign Policy 1776-1807 Dbq, Papers

Science of the cosmos, science of the soul Essay Example

Science of the cosmos, science of the soul Essay William chittick is an interpreter and translator philosophical Islamic text. In his book the Science of the Cosmos, science of the Soul, exposes Islamic intellectualism, he shows his mastery in the world of Sufism and Islam, he cuts across religion and science two conflicting issues that he argues have affected the modern life. The book is like his personal view of Islam on the areas of religion and science traditional issues and modern issues. In this books he tries, expose how traditional Islam believes have been changed by the so called modern life he urges Muslim leaders to opt for extreme forms of Islam, which definitely will create and cause alarm to many who thinks he is a supporter of extremist groups and he also shows how important the so called traditional Islamic life is in this era, he explains that, such life seen as traditional can be used to solve current maladies. Professor Chittick in this book seems to defend Islam and paints it as a superior religion compared to o thers. In support for this he says that if the basic concept of traditional Islamic religion are upheld and practiced, this will lead to a conducive environment that will enable prosperity in the field of philosophy and science. This shows how strongly he tries to defend the core or the traditional believes of religion.The book is divided into seven chapters; the first six chapters are lectures and the seventh chapter is compilation from his other works. The first three chapters in particular have in depth look in philosophy and knowledge that is considered very important for Muslims in this new age. According to professor chittick, the thought that is behind the mentioned notion is considered as Islam’s core essence. According to him also, intellectual advancements are of great importance like principles of the Quaran that urges the Muslim to ponder, reflect and think. The first chapter tackles how an important religion is being rejected by its followers, professor chittick shows the importance of understanding the reason behind some beliefs of the Islam religion and not just knowing how things are done but by knowing why things are done that way. He says understanding something needs studying it and learning from the intellectuals in that field. He argues that lack of understanding combined with influence modernity has had on tradition Islamic religion has contributed a lot to the vanishing of a heritage, that is the traditional Muslim culture (Chittick, 2007). He argues that there are new forms of idols that have replaced the core traditional believes, for example he points out how democracy science and the urge for progressAfter exposing the current trend that’s contributing to erosion of the Muslim culture, he points out two Islamic sources of knowledge and law; naqli and aqli which mean transmitted knowledge and intellectual knowledge respectively. Naqli or transmitted knowledge is the traditional that god prophet himself revealed; in other words it is the knowledge that has been passed from the generation of people who were close to Prophet Mohammed. Examples of these traditions include, praying five times a day which was practiced in the days of Prophet Mohammed and it was passed from generation to generation and it’s still practiced even today. He shows the importance of intellectual knowledge, the knowledge that makes one understand and it is gained through extensive mind training through the use of scholarly work. Such knowledge also calls for the use of teachers who are believed to have knowledge in that field at hand. Intelligence as he portrays it is believed to be got from intellectuals; this intelligence helps one in discerning what to do and what not to. He talks of a visitor from the past seeing today’s intellect and wondering what went wrong. This in my view is like a representation of how over the years how people have changed in the way they perceive and understand things in the Muslim wor ld. His message seems to me that, modern Muslim seem to understand the importance of upholding the core Islamic values and not let modernity brain wash them. He talks about how scientific intellect makes people think that they know everything and in the real sense they are being derailed from their basic and core beliefs that are believed to provide answers to many matters in life (Chittick, 2007).After exposing intellectual matters, professor chittick, brings out the concept of thought and how something a simple as a thought means a lot and can be a driving force to identifying who we are. On matters of thought, he exposes how deep he understands the power of thoughts. He argues that the core or traditional thought is so influential to Muslim in their day to day life. Having gained the intelligence in the Muslim culture, he argues that you should be in a position to make intellectual decision even concerning modern life issues. Concerning human life he argues that, the goal of any human life should be the achievement of status of a perfect being, that is   a human being who have an Islamic thought, a thought that is paramount in whatever one does, a thought that cannot be surpassed by any other thing. Such thought are not transmitted; but learned as through learning one gets to understand the reason behind the facts.He also argues that, the Islamic thought has suffered and people don’t realize it is in the verge of dying, people believe in science and science is considered to be an offspring of intellectual Islamic thought.   Professor Chittick argues that many Muslims nowadays don’t understand intellectual progress and modernization principles that are against Islam. Such an act according to him is a reflection of how the so called modern Muslims have stopped using their minds and ignoring the intellectual knowledge they are supposed to have concerning their religion. According to his own personalized description of intellectual knowledge, he expresses it as a heightened individual’s awareness which surpasses many idiosyncrasies around it. To further contrast modern learning, he talks about the tahqiq that aims at discovering the haqq which is inside the one seeking intelligence (Chittick, 2007).Another major issue he deems important is the fact that intellectual knowledge is like the pivot of Islam, if it lacks, the teaching of Islam will be deemed incomplete. According to chittick philosophers nowadays are going through a session of fearful cognition when it comes to bringing together religion and practice, and this has made people think that what they have in their minds is convenient to them instead of the right thing. Such a situation is seen as the cause of having other gods as he describes a god as anything that gives someone orientation and meaning of life, he describes the modern life as having so many gods and people whatever is appealing to them.   Professor Chittick in this book also takes us to t he understanding of matters or things that are beyond ideology (Chittick, 2007). The book seams to ponder a question of how will people know what they think they know, and this brings a debate about religion and modernity. He argues that the only solution to such problems and conflicts is adoption or bringing back the core principles of Islam which will provide answers to all the topics which arise.In the book, chittick urges Muslim to practice reflection and thinking about the things they have learned as this will enable them achieve a high grade of apprehension; this seems to have come direct from his personal life as he has spent many years researching in this field of Islam philosophy and religion. Through professor Chittick’s work, there is an insight of the problems of the world and at the same time solutions to the problems can be drawn from it. As a matter of contrast, many might have thought that he will not show a possibility of co existence between modernity and Is lam, but in contrast to this though he says with the right interpretation of the Quaran the two can successfully coexist. Chittick suggests that following the traditions guided by intellectual thought can be the right track to success of individual and the whole of humanity. Chittick argues that as philosophers, they should be concerned much with scrapping off the cot of modernity that is covering traditionalism, and as a result, Islamic and Sufism mechanism will be given a chance to thrive. Chittick also argues that, the approaches which are modernistic in nature make the society capitalistic and this makes the souls of an individual empty and in need of satisfaction(Chittick, 2007). On the other hand, approaches which are traditional make someone eager to learn and thus creating awareness that promotes the ability to smoothly go through new situations or issues betterHe talks of how scientism culture is blinding people and they are being taken away from the core truth by the scien tism worldview. He warns of how Muslim intellectual thinking is being slowly killed by the new thought that is based on modern ideas that are based on science and not an immortal being. Professor Chittick expresses that in the modern world, there are so many teachers and so many ideas being brought up and it seems like there is competition among the different ideologies.All these people in the different area of study have different things they want to achieve, and this creates a competition between the traditional Islamic values and scientism values. He emphasizes the fact that all will be possible if one acknowledges God and see him as real and not as a myth. Science is believed to picture religion as an imagination that cannot be touched or proofed as science seems to prove everything it puts across. To chittick death has hit Islamic intellectualism, and without it one cannot understand own self. In order to understand anything, you need to understand own self, so for those who la ck the Islamic intellectualism are lost as they don’t have base of understanding, this is just a reflection of how much his 40 years if Islamic study have transformed him and given him a deeper understanding of the core believes of Islam that cannot change no matter what.Professor Chittick at some point in the book bases is work on the philosophy advanced by Hossein Nasr, who has had a tremendous impact in his work, he acknowledges him as an adamant speaker of the tradition that has been left to erode. Professor Chittick argues that there is a very big relation of cosmos and soul, which is expressed in terms of naming. Names are believed to signify an inner understanding of something, names represent a certain thing learned from the cosmos, that is to say nature and he argues that, names which are not guided by nature can bring disaster to those who adopt them (Chittick, 2007). In my own understanding, I think this is to show how deep he wants to emphasize the importance of n aming and their connections with nature.In this work professor chittick expresses how knowledgeable and experienced he is in the area of Islam and the philosophy associated with Islam. His work is full of insight and it also provokes debate on some issues. After reading his work you cant remain the same as there is a lot to learn and it gives one, more so a Muslim a big task and a new way of practicing their faith. He urges them to understand the reason why things are done that way and they should not just follow things because the leaders or people who are deemed superior say so. He give an example wit a mathematics question; if a teachers enters in class and tells students that one plus one is two, and then after some time the students is asked why one plus one is two and says its because the teacher says so, the student will be depicting a picture of lack of understanding of the core concepts. In the same way, towards matters of religion, followers are supposed to understand why they practice some things and not just follow things blindlyProfessor Chittick really did a commendable work and he has shade more light in Islamic religious matters, and may be to some modern Muslim, it’s a wake up call to watch their ways and see if they still follow the core principle of their beliefReferenceChittick, C. (2007). Science of the Cosmos, Science of the Soul: the Pertinence of IslamicCosmology in the modern World. England, One World Publication

People Management and Organisation Development The WritePass Journal

People Management and Organisation Development Executive Summary People Management and Organisation Development . Strategic Organisational Communication: In a Global Economy. Hoboken: John Wiley Sons. Cummings, T. and Worley, C., 2014. Organisation Development and Change. Belmont: Cengage Learning. Fairholm, M., 2009. Leadership and Organisational Strategy. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 14(1), pp.1-16. Freedman, A., 2011. Using Action Learning for Organisation Development and Change. OD Practitioner, 43(2), pp.7-13. Griffin, R. and Moorhead, G., 2009. Organisational Behavior: Managing People and Organisations. 9th ed. Belmont: Cengage Learning. Hashim, M., 2014. Organisational change: case study of GM (General Motors). Journal of Business Administration and Management Sciences Research, 3(1), pp.1-5. Hendrickson, S. and Gray, E., 2012. Legitimizing Resistance to Organisational Change: A Social Work Social Justice Perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), pp.50-59. Griffith-Cooper, B. and King, K., 2007. The partnership between project management and organisational change: integrating change management with change leadership. Performance Improvement, 46(1), pp.14-20. Idris, K., Adekalu, S. and Genty, K., 2014. Organisation Development and Strategic Intervention for Enterprise Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 16(11), pp.156-171. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., 2001. Building a Strategy – Focused Organisation. Ivey Business Journal, May/June 2001. Available at http://iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/leadership/building-a-strategy-focused-organisation#.VGS9rWdqRIh [Accessed 12 November 2014]. Kotter, J. and Schlesinger, L., 2008. Choosing Strategies for Change. Harvard Business Review, July/ August 2008, pp.1-10. Lunenburg, F., 2010. Organisational Development: Implementing Planned Change. International Journal of Management, Business and Administration, 13(1), pp.1-9. Oswick, C., 2013. Reflections: OD or Not OD that is the Question! A Constructivists Thoughts on the Changing Nature of Change. Journal of Change Management, 13(4), pp.371-381. Maimunah, I., 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility and its role in community development: An international perspective. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(9), pp.200-209. Nordin, E., 2014. Communicating Organisational Change: Strategies for Communicating Change. The Clute Institute. International Academic Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp.135-145. Available at http://cluteinstitute.com/conference-proceedings/2014SAPapers/Article%20236.pdf. [Accessed 12 November 2014]. Pasmore, W., Woodman, R., Noumair, D. and Shani, A., 2013. Research in Organisational Change and Development. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Roberts, G., 2014. Servant Leader Human Resource Management: A Moral and Spiritual Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Rothwell, W., Stavros, J., Sullivan, R. and Sullivan, A., 2009. Practicing Organisation Development: A Guide for Leading Change. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley Sons. Samson, D. and Bevington, T., 2012. Implementing Strategic Change: Managing Processes and Interfaces to Develop a Highly Productive Organisation. London: Kogan Publishers. Schabracq, M., 2009. Changing Organisational Culture: The Change Agents Guidebook. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons. Wu, M., 2012. Managing Stakeholders: An Integrative Perspective on the Source of Competitive Advantage. Asian Social Science, 8(10), pp.160-172. Yaeger, T. and Sorensen, P., 2009. Strategic Organisation Development: Managing Change for Success. Charlotte: IAP Publishing. Yilmaz, B. and Gunel, O., 2009. The Importance of Strategic Stakeholder Management in Tourism Sector: Research on Probable Applications. TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF TOURISM, 4(1), pp.97-108.